A coalition of former Australian politicians and numerous celebrities is calling for a ban on gambling advertisements, citing significant social costs affecting ordinary Australians.
Australia Engaged in Intense Debate Over Gambling Advertisement Ban
With annual losses reaching AU$25 billion, the debate over a comprehensive ban on gambling ads has intensified. This issue has become one of Australia’s most heated discussions on industry regulation.
The appeal features signatures from former Prime Ministers John Howard and Malcolm Turnbull. It also includes numerous concerned citizens, advocates, and experts in problem gambling.
Addressed to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, the letter aims to resolve the ongoing deadlock. This deadlock has been preventing decisive action on the matter.
The letter highlights the excessive exposure of gambling ads to children through various media. It stresses the need to curb this “tsunami” of advertising.
The prevalence of gambling ads during major sports events worsens the situation. It contributes to fostering a new generation of gamblers.
According to the letter, gambling ads are rampant in Australia. Over one million ads are broadcast on free-to-air TV and radio.
The letter calls for action based on the Murphy Report. This report includes 31 recommendations to address the risks associated with gambling and its advertising.
One key recommendation is a gradual three-year ban to give gambling companies and affected entities time to adjust. The letter seeks to mitigate the harm caused by these advertisements.
Total Ban on Gambling Ads Unlikely
However, a full ban may not be feasible under the current Albanese government. Instead, there might be a compromise involving restrictions, such as limiting ads to two per channel before 10 pm.
This approach contrasts with other countries, which have taken varying measures. For example, the UK is re-evaluating its regulations, Spain initially imposed a full ban but later reversed it, while Italy has maintained strict regulations.
Some view this compromise as insufficient given the growing support for a total ban on gambling ads.
